Date: February 5, 1998 To: Invited Participants From: Mike Ritzwoller (CU) and Bill Walter (LLNL) ritzwoller@lemond.colorado.edu, bwalter@llnl.gov Re: Tenative Agenda for the WORKSHOP ON THE U.S. USE OF SURFACE WAVES IN MONITORING THE CTBT Included below is the tentative agenda for the CTBT surface wave workshop. Please check it and let us know if you would like changes in your contribution. (Is the time too long, too short, the right subject matter for you, etc.?) We are also interested in more general comments that you might have about the outline and content of the meeting. This is a tentative agenda and it is adaptable to the interests and considered judgments of the participants. To change it, however, we will need to hear from you. This agenda and updates are available via the web site for the workshop at: http://abdu.colorado.edu/sw_workshop.html ***************************************************************************** THURSDAY MARCH 19, 1998 Morning Session: Chair: Mike Ritzwoller 8:00 M. Ritzwoller, B. Walter: Welcome, Introduction, Logistics, and Overview of Workshop Session 1: Regional Dispersion Measurement Comparison (data selection, measurment methodology, error assessment) (each speaker plans to talk for less than 10 minutes (max 6 viewgraphs) to allow for questions and answers from floor) 8:20 A. Levshin Measurement at CU and general comments 8:35 D. McNamara Measurement at LLNL 8:50 L. Jones Measurement at LANL 9:05 R. Herrmann Measurement at SLU 9:20 J. Stevens Global and IDC Measurements 9:35 B. Walter Comparison of dispersion curves supplied by researchers for 10 preselected event-station pairs* 9:50 Discussion 10:15-10:30 Break Session 2: Regional Dispersion Map Comparison (data coverage, inversion technique, resolution estimation) (each speaker plans to talk for less than 10 minutes (max 6 viewgraphs) to allow for questions and answers from floor) 10:30 D. McNamara No. Africa and the Middle East 10:45 R. Herrmann Saudi Arabia and Surroundings 11:00 M. Ritzwoller Eurasia 11:15 J. Stevens World 11:30 A. Rodgers Comparison of 20 s Rayleigh wave group velocity maps supplied by researchers for 10-50N, 25-100E region* 11:45 Discussion 12:15 - 1:30 Lunch Afternoon Session: Chair: Bill Walter Session 3: Customers for surface wave research 1:30 D. Russell AFTAC's interest in surface waves 2:30 R. Keyser DOE Knowledge Base and surface wave information 3:00 C. Meade NPTO's interest in surface waves 3:15 Discussion 3:45 - 4:00 Break Session 4: Use and Evaluation of group velocity maps 4:00 J. Stevens Using group velocity maps and the Ms-mb discriminant 4:30 K. McLaughlin Surface wave processing at the PIDC 4:45 D. Harkrider Evaluation of group velocity maps 5:15 Discussion 5:30 Adjourn for the day. Evening Dinner at a good local restaurant. FRIDAY MARCH 20, 1998 Morning Session: Chair: Bill Walter 8:00 M. Ritzwoller, B. Walter Opening Remarks Session 5: Dispersion Complications, Problems and Future Directions (each speaker plans to talk for less than 10 minutes (max 6 viewgraphs) to allow for questions and answers from floor) 8:15 E. Larson Anisotropy and global phase velocity estimation 8:30 M. Ritzwoller Source group time shifts, mislocation, anisotropy Session 6: Source Characterization (each speaker plans to talk for less than 10 minutes (max 6 viewgraphs) to allow for questions and answers from floor) 8:45 H. Patton LANL source characterization 9:00 A. Levshin Moment tensor, depth estimation for Lop Nor 9:15 Discussion Session 7: Velocity models and surface wave dispersion maps (each speaker plans to talk for less than 10 minutes (max 6 viewgraphs) to allow for questions and answers from floor) 9:30 W. Mooney Global crustal model 9:45 B. Walter Evaluation of MidEast/North Africa velocity models 10:00 - 10:15 Break 10:15 R. Engdahl Eurasian upper mantle model 10:30 M. Ritzwoller Eurasian crustal/lithospheric model, potential use for CTBT 10:45 Discussion Session 8: Closing Discussion, Preparation of Comments for Workshop Report 11:00 - 12:00 Discussion 12:00 Adjourn meeting * The idea for these two sessions is to ask participants to supply dispersion curves for 10 pre-selected event station pairs in the 10-50 N latitude, 25-100 E longitude region as well as their 20s Rayleigh wave tomographic maps in this region and then compare them. The purpose is not to choose which institution's maps or measures are more correct, but to understand the causes of any differences the comparisons reveal and provide a common basis for discussion.